The feud between El Taiger and Ja Rulay continues to escalate beyond anticipation. Their near altercation last May in Varadero seems to have been just the beginning, as threats now extend beyond social media.
In an Instagram live session, which was fully reproduced by “Papel Encara” on YouTube, the "La Historia" singer suggested that Ja Rulay chased him with a firearm. However, what stands out the most is El Taiger's view on crime and the role of the police in Cuba.
Zero Tolerance for Crime in Cuba
"Do you think it's easy for me to carry a .22 like the one you had or a .38? But I can't do that because if the police stop me, open my bag, and find a firearm in a country where there's zero tolerance for crime, that's five years without the right to minimum," El Taiger is heard saying.
El Taiger also mentioned that both are under a restraining order, implying that Ja Rulay is violating this restriction, which could lead to a more substantial case against him. He further stated that Ja Rulay would now need a good lawyer to convince the prosecutor that he wasn't carrying a weapon.
El Taiger's issues aren't limited to U.S. soil. Although he was released from jail last August after being accused of assault and armed robbery, he now finds himself embroiled in controversy once again, this time from Cuba.
El Taiger and Ja Rulay Feud: Key Questions Answered
In light of the ongoing dispute between El Taiger and Ja Rulay, here are some frequently asked questions to provide more context and insight.
What sparked the feud between El Taiger and Ja Rulay?
The feud began with a near physical altercation in Varadero last May and has since escalated with threats and accusations exchanged on social media.
What did El Taiger say about crime in Cuba?
El Taiger emphasized that Cuba has zero tolerance for crime, stating that being caught with a firearm by the police could result in a five-year prison sentence.
Are there legal implications stemming from this feud?
Yes, both artists are under a restraining order, and Ja Rulay's alleged violation of this order could lead to further legal action.