While the Cuban people endure severe economic hardships, Miguel Díaz-Canel and Manuel Marrero, the island's president and prime minister, participated in a pro-Palestine march in Havana sporting American brand sneakers costing over $100. This stark contradiction between their anti-U.S. rhetoric and choice of luxury footwear has sparked a wave of criticism on social media, where their consistency is questioned in a nation that persistently blames the U.S. embargo for the countless hardships faced by its citizens.
The march, intended to show solidarity with the Palestinian people, saw a sparse turnout—highlighting the communist government's declining influence. It began at the Fragua Martiana and ended at the anti-imperialist platform in front of the U.S. Embassy. However, the focus shifted from the political demonstration to the sneakers worn by these leaders: Díaz-Canel donned a pair of Nikes, while Marrero chose Skechers, brands that are beyond the reach of most Cubans.
Contrast Between Leadership and Reality
In a country where retirees earn less than five dollars a month and many workers make no more than fifteen, the disparity was glaring and underscored the regime's blatant double (or triple, even quadruple) standards. Yet, what else can be expected from a president who considers his friends and family as the primary gauge of public opinion? Friends and family? Seriously?
Social Media Outrage
Social media platforms were flooded with sarcastic remarks and criticisms, highlighting the disconnect between the ruling elite and the harsh realities faced by ordinary Cubans, for whom daily survival is a relentless battle. And the question remains—what about the embargo? It seems it only affects the everyday citizens, not the leaders living in luxury.