Recently, Ja Rulay found himself under scrutiny from Alexander Otaola, who questioned whether the reggaeton artist had truly purchased a house near the Casino Deportivo in Havana. In one of his shows, Otaola labeled him a “speculator” and “inflator,” claiming the property was still listed for sale at $70,000, the same price Ja Rulay allegedly paid.
Otaola commented, “You realize it's all a façade, they need to pretend that artists in Cuba are progressing, that they have the means to invest, that they're getting ahead. It's all fake.”
While on his European tour in Spain, Ja Rulay responded to Otaola's allegations, asserting that the house is indeed his. He confirmed he purchased it outright with cash: “It's in my name, I no longer live in Colón; my ID now says Casino Deportivo. I paid for it in full.”
Ja Rulay challenged Otaola directly, saying, “Oti, I have a question for you. Show me the deeds to all those properties of yours. I'm 21, and I'm about to show you my deed. I've been waiting for this moment to prove that I paid in full and signed to become the owner.”
The artist suggested that Otaola's alleged properties might not even be fully paid off, hinting at how many homes in the United States are financed through bank loans.
Frequently Asked Questions about Ja Rulay and Otaola's Dispute
What did Alexander Otaola accuse Ja Rulay of?
Alexander Otaola accused Ja Rulay of being a "speculator" and "inflator," questioning the authenticity of his claims about purchasing a house near the Casino Deportivo in Havana.
How did Ja Rulay respond to Otaola's accusations?
Ja Rulay responded by asserting that he did purchase the house with his own money, stating that he paid in cash and now holds the deed to the property.
What did Ja Rulay suggest about Otaola's properties?
Ja Rulay implied that Otaola's properties might not be entirely paid for and could be financed through loans, similar to many homes in the United States.