CubaHeadlines

CIA Whistleblower Alleges Cover-Up in Havana Syndrome, Points Finger at Russia

Sunday, January 5, 2025 by Charlotte Gomez

CIA Whistleblower Alleges Cover-Up in Havana Syndrome, Points Finger at Russia
CIA building in winter - Image of © cia.gov

An ex-officer from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), identified only as "Alice" to keep her identity confidential, has come forward with claims that the agency concealed attacks linked to the notorious "Havana Syndrome." According to her account, reported by The Washington Times, Alice suffered a suspected energy weapon attack in 2021 while stationed in Africa, leaving her with severe and ongoing injuries.

Numerous reports from U.S. government agencies highlight that the "Havana Syndrome" has impacted hundreds of diplomats, intelligence personnel, and military members stationed abroad since the initial cases were reported in Cuba in 2016. Affected individuals have described symptoms such as traumatic brain injuries, dizziness, memory lapses, balance issues, tinnitus, and nerve pain.

The Case of Alice and Her Accusations

These incidents, officially termed by the U.S. government as "Anomalous Health Incidents" (AHI), have sparked suspicions that foreign adversaries, like Russia and China, might be employing sonic or microwave weapons in a potential "cognitive warfare" scenario.

Alice recounted that the attack occurred one Saturday night at her residence in Africa. She heard an unusual noise and felt a vibration in her feet, akin to the tremor from a speaker. She immediately experienced severe pain in her left ear, dizziness, and a loud ringing that made her fear for her life. According to the former officer, these attacks could be executed using portable weapons, such as devices hidden in backpacks or vehicles.

She asserted that the CIA not only ignored these attacks but also withheld critical information, leaving affected agents vulnerable. "It's a cover-up and should be terrifying for all Americans," she stated. Furthermore, she accused the Biden administration of downplaying reports of these attacks and the potential involvement of foreign adversaries.

Evidence and Controversies

A report from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence's subcommittee, led by Representative Rick Crawford, recently asserted that there is "reliable evidence" indicating that AHIs result from attacks by foreign adversaries. A 2014 document from the National Security Agency also disclosed that Russia possessed suspicious microwave technology potentially linked to these incidents, a hypothesis supported by an investigative report published in April, conducted over a year by The Insider, in collaboration with 60 Minutes and Der Spiegel.

The extensive journalistic investigation revealed that members of the Kremlin's military intelligence sabotage unit (GRU Unit 29155) were located at sites of alleged attacks on U.S. government personnel and their families abroad. Despite these revelations, the U.S. intelligence community's official assessment concluded that it's "unlikely" a foreign adversary is involved, causing skepticism among victims and experts.

Catherine Herridge, a former CBS and Fox News reporter, highlighted that her research involved interviews with over a dozen patients and gathered testimonies accusing the CIA of "manipulating" information about the attacks. Moreover, Herridge confirmed that multiple sources indicated that CIA Director William Burns privately believed Russia was behind some of the attacks. However, the agency's official stance remains neutral, emphasizing the importance of a professional analysis to uncover the truth.

Impact and Allegations

The "Havana Syndrome" continues to be a contentious issue within the U.S. intelligence community. Allegations of a cover-up and a lack of support for victims have ignited heated debates about the government's handling of these cases. Meanwhile, victims like Alice continue to grapple with debilitating injuries while demanding a more transparent and decisive response.

On its part, the CIA has reiterated its commitment to caring for its agents and has stressed that it is working diligently to address this challenge. However, the victims' frustration and the growing suspicions regarding the involvement of foreign adversaries raise serious questions about the safety of U.S. officers overseas and the government's ability to protect them from emerging threats.

Potential Political Shifts with Trump's Return

The resurgence of the "Havana Syndrome" on the U.S. political agenda could take on a new dimension with the possible return of Donald Trump to the White House. Historically, the Trump administration adopted a "hardline" stance toward Cuba, enforcing sanctions and reversing rapprochement policies established by his predecessor, Barack Obama.

Should Trump regain the presidency, the renewed focus on the investigation might fuel a narrative of geopolitical confrontation. Some factors to consider include:

1. Toughening Foreign Policy: Trump could leverage this momentum to justify a more aggressive approach against regimes considered hostile, such as the Cuban, Russian, or Chinese governments. This aligns with his previous national security strategy, which prioritized diplomatic and economic pressure on strategic adversaries.

2. Diplomatic Relations Review: The "Havana Syndrome" incidents prompted a partial closure of the U.S. Embassy in Cuba during Trump's tenure, as well as the expulsion of Cuban diplomats. If the hypothesis of a foreign adversary holds, a Trump-led administration might reinstate these measures or impose new sanctions.

3. Escalating Tensions with Russia and China: The report suggests Russian agents could be involved in the attacks, an accusation that might heighten tensions between Washington and Moscow. Additionally, China, another key adversary in Trump's foreign policy, has also been mentioned in previous investigations.

4. Pressure on the Intelligence Community: The congressional report accuses the CIA and other intelligence agencies of concealing information about the phenomenon. This could open a new front of conflict for a Trump administration, given his historic distrust towards these agencies during his first term.

In conclusion, Trump's return to the White House could signify a significant shift in U.S. policy regarding the "Havana Syndrome." This could translate into diplomatic actions, economic sanctions, and a more confrontational discourse towards countries identified as potential culprits.

Frequently Asked Questions about Havana Syndrome

What is the Havana Syndrome?

The Havana Syndrome refers to a series of unexplained health incidents affecting U.S. diplomats, intelligence officers, and military personnel abroad, characterized by symptoms like brain injuries, dizziness, and tinnitus.

Who is suspected to be behind the Havana Syndrome attacks?

Suspicion has fallen on foreign adversaries such as Russia and China, who may have used sonic or microwave weapons in these attacks, though official assessments have deemed foreign involvement "unlikely."

How has the U.S. government responded to the Havana Syndrome?

The U.S. government has launched investigations and provided medical support to victims, but has faced criticism for alleged cover-ups and inadequate response measures.

© CubaHeadlines 2025