Alexander Otaola's legal team has officially received the lawsuit initiated by Flor de Cuba. However, instead of focusing on the defamation charges against the media personality, a significant number of internet users have directed their criticism at the influencer herself. Amidst derogatory comments and insults, some have even suggested that she should be deported back to Cuba, given the current challenges faced by Cuban immigrants in the United States who are still waiting to obtain residency.
"Another one heading back to Cuba, but not sure what role she’ll find at Sandro's bar since Cintunchurre is already there," commented one user. Others chimed in with, “Flor de peo is completely lost; send her back to Cuba,” and “Poor Flor de peo, people need to understand the law.” Skeptics have also speculated, “She’s just a character created by the dictatorship for entertainment,” and “Communism has left her confused. Here, we have freedom of speech, and calling someone crazy is not defamation.”
Critics continued, “She’s been called a drug addict and a bad mother without taking offense,” and “Oh my God, little Flor of stink doesn't know what she's getting into.” Questions arose about her legal standing, with remarks like, “I don’t understand how someone here on a tourist visa (assuming it hasn't expired) can file a lawsuit,” and “Flor de peo, the flip-flop queen.” Some even suggested, “Comrade Flor de peo is looking for a possible repatriation,” as users reacted to Otaola's response on YouTube.
Only a few defended Flor de Cuba's right to sue, with comments such as, “Mr. Otaola, you use mass media channels, so your opinions can damage someone's image or reputation, potentially causing economic harm, which warrants financial compensation,” and “Whether she’s right or wrong, you have spoken about her without evidence.” Others agreed, “You’re a shameless person. I’m not saying you shouldn’t create content, but name-calling and offending everyone is wrong. You’ve been particularly harsh on her, and if it’s affecting her financially and she has proof, you’re in trouble.”
After announcing her lawsuit against Otaola, Flor de Cuba publicly shared evidence supporting her claims. She accuses him of labeling her as “a legal pimp,” “a madam of prostitution among young Cuban women,” and “the front for Sandro Castro.”
Public Reaction to the Otaola and Flor de Cuba Controversy
Why are people criticizing Flor de Cuba instead of Otaola?
Many critics argue that Flor de Cuba's actions appear to be an overreach, and some see her as a tool of the Cuban regime, hence the backlash. Furthermore, freedom of speech is a valued principle in the U.S., which complicates defamation claims.
What are the main accusations Flor de Cuba has against Otaola?
Flor de Cuba accuses Otaola of defaming her by calling her a “legal pimp,” a “madam of prostitution,” and “the front for Sandro Castro,” without providing any evidence for these claims.
How are Cuban immigrants in the U.S. reacting to this situation?
The reaction among Cuban immigrants is mixed; while some support Flor de Cuba's legal rights, others view her actions as detrimental to the community's image, especially during a time when many are struggling to secure residency.